Saturday, 24 January 2015

Baby, Hindi Film

Or Is this D-Day 2 set in a place Where Camels Dare? Going by Neeraj Pandey's concern for India and the applause he elicits from the audience for his formulaic dialogues on social concern, is this Wednesday 2?

We can certainly enjoy the vicarious pleasures of simulating Abbotabad, but film makers really have the power in their hands to provoke a public debate on radically refreshing solutions to a problem which seemed to be approached in a uni-dimensional way. An eye for an eye can only make the whole world blind.

Nevertheless if you can ignore the formulaic dialogues, jingoism and sequences consciously playing to the gallery, you can sit back and enjoy this escapist text book thriller elegantly shot which ends up in an enjoyable climax adapted from Argo!!!


Wednesday, 21 January 2015

'I', Tamil Film, Dhoom 3 just got better

'I',  Dhoom 3 just got better

From Shankar, who had the imagination to adapt Frost Nixon (interviews) about seven years ahead of Hollywood in Muthalvan, you know that he is probably capable of more than rehash's.

Imagine the grandeur of Indian in 1996, about twenty years ago, Shankar had the audacity and ambition to replicate technical variations of Forrest Gump with very limited resources. The rehash of Indian("Anniyan")ten years later was probably a satisfactory serving with variations.

One is really not sure if you want a rehash again after ten years, minus the intelligence, minus Nedumudi Venu and Prakash Raj, minus the idealism, minus Sujatha's witty dialogues, plus some the surprisingly loud A.R. Rahman, poor writing, bad screenplay, extremely poor stunt choreography(I am surprised how Shankar could ever allow it) and weird vendetta reducing this to a mere 1970s or 1980s mindless Bollywood revenge drama.

Despite very poor reviews I still went to see it for Vikram who has sacrificed nearly two to three years of his career. For the whole part of the first half I was shell shocked that the Madras Local Lingo did not fit into Vikram's persona. I am not sure if Vikram got the accent right. And when Vikram morphs into the second avtaar, Vikram's lingo just does not fit into the classy person he is. As the hunchback though I thought he built an admirable style in the walk. Despite being a Vikram fan, one has to sadly observe that he is getting older. For all the hype about Vikram's performance, I was quite disappointed. This is probably what writing can do to an actor's performance.

Shankar's love affair with flowers though seems to be extraordinarily fresh. The China that we probably have not seen in Indian Cinema was breathtaking. And Amy of course does her bit, to save us from the disappointment.

If I thought Dhoom 3 was the worst film made in Indian Cinema, than Shankar's 'I' has made it look like as if it is Oscar worthy for the best picture.

When professionals like Shankar who have the name, fame and money, make a film like 'I', I believe it is time Maslow's Hierarchy should be revisited.


Saturday, 17 January 2015

The Imitation Game: Inspiring



I have taken the liberty of verbatim reproducing many of the dialogues from the film to write this narrative/review. Idea was to just create interest for as many people as possible to see this film.

*********
As Alan Turing recounts his past, he introspects, What am I? Am I a person? Am I a machine? Am I a war hero? Am I a criminal?

As he is fading away from life his friend Joan Clarke visits him

Joan Clarke:

This morning I took a train through a city that would not exist if it wasn’t for you. I bought a ticket from a man who would likely be dead if it wasn’t for you. I read up on my work, a whole field of scientific inquiry that only exists because of you. If you wish you could have been ‘normal’, I can promise you, I do not. The world is an infinitely better place precisely because you weren’t.

Alan Turing
Is that what you think?

Joan Clarke
... I think that sometimes it is the very people who no one imagines anything of who do the things that no one can imagine.

*********

Early on, Alan Turing is hired by the British Intelligence to break ENIGMA, the greatest encryption device in history, which the German uses for all their communications.

Alan’s argument is that Enigma is a machine. A very well-designed machine. What if only a machine can defeat another machine?

His theory is that a machine that can solve any problem. It doesn’t just do one thing: It does everything.
The machine isn’t only programmable, it’s re-programmable. Human beings can compute large sums very quickly. He want’s his machine to be Smarter. To make a calculation, and then to determine what to do next. Like a person does. His vision includes an electrical brain. A digital computer.

Of course machines can’t think “as human beings do.” A machine is different from a human being; hence, it would think differently.

The interesting question is, just because something thinks differently from you, does that mean it’s not thinking?  We allow that humans have such divergences from one another. Somebody may like
strawberries. Someone else hates ice-skating. I may cry at sad films. You may be allergic to pollen. What does it mean tohave different tastes — different preferences — other than to say that our brains work differently?

That we think differently from one another? And if we can say that about each another, why can’t we say the same for brains made of copper and steel?

After breaking ENIGMA, the mathematician that Alan was, developed a system for determining how much intelligence to act on. Which attacks to stop, which to let through. Statistical analysis. The minimum number of actions it’ll take to win the war, but the maximum number they we’re able to take before the Germans get suspicious.

It is estimated that Alan Turing’s efforts helped truncate the the World War two by a minimum of two years and about 14 million lives were saved.

The movie is inspiration unlimited. Highly recommended for students and professionals in all walks of life.

This biopic which is presented as a mystery suspense thriller, is equally touching. Going by Wikipedia the narrative seems to be a faithful rendition of Alan Turing’s life. The screenplay has a touch of class, especially the tragic demise of his friend while at school which converts him into an atheist in real life is beautifully introduced at the fag end of Alan Turing’s life, the death that seems to perpetually haunt him. The camera slowly progressing and capturing Alan Turing’s moist eyes shrouded in anger and disbelief even as he vocally negates his close relationship with his friend.

And as Benedict Cumberbatch, enacts the ecstasy of breaking the ENIGMA code and gushes, this is all the German that I need to know, he might have just sealed his stake for the best actor award for this OSCAR. The complexity of Turing’s has been so beautifully and subtly nuanced that Cumberbatch seems to have banished Sherlock from our minds.

This movie needed its star and the screenplay to be perfect. Well they are just as perfect as they can be.

Alan Mathison Turing, (23 June 1912 – 7 June 1954) was a British pioneering computer scientist, mathematician, logician, cryptanalyst, philosopher, mathematical biologist, and marathon and ultra distance runner. He was highly influential in the development of computer science, providing a formalization of the concepts of "algorithm” and "computation” with the Turing machine, which can be considered a model of a general purpose computer. Turing is widely considered to be the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence.

Incidentally Alan Turing ran a time of just 11 minutes less than the silver medalist in the 1948 olympics marathoner !!!

Friday, 2 January 2015

PK, Hindi Movie, Plagiarism King, BTW, Where was Aamir Khan?



PK, Hindi Movie, Plagiarism King, BTW, Where was Aamir Khan?

Courtesy Wikipedia

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.

For the kind of reputation that Raju Hirnani enjoys and especially when he is making a film after five years, there is an expectation and a responsibility.

For all the adulation which Aamir Khan enjoys there is an expectation and a responsibility.

When a movie, especially tends to release over  long weekends,and other films probably cannot release during that time and is expected to gross several hundred crores, and the whole world's attention is drawn to the movie, there is an expectation and responsibility.

When other film makers all over the world see a work of art which is made in India, there is an opinion that gets formed and judgments which get made about India, there is an expectation and responsibility.

Wiki is very explicit on plagiarism,  Language, thoughts, ideas or expressions, however if I may be permitted to add, based on PK even Hairstyles(Oh!!!I am sorry, that could fall under expression!!!)

The makers of PK, have worked overtime, in all good intention to make us all feel good, with noble intentions have appropriated from a whole lot of films.

It is sad to see, when a country of  supremely talented people, celebrate the mediocrity of the plagiarized PK. I am sure we are an inebriated lot!!!!

Mr. Hirnani, You could take a cue from Vetrimaran, who clearly referred to the six movies that influenced "Aadukalam". I am sure with all the nobility that you intend in your films, it is time you really walk the talk.

Mr. Aamir Khan: BTW, The credits say that you have acted in the film, but I was only able to see a protagonist, simulate the character of Vikram(in the Tamil film "Pithamagan") in the garb of Tom Hanks and a dash of Chaplin!!!! BY Gaawd, Mona Darling, though was certainly  happy with your pronunciation of Gawd, Gawd I  understand thought that you got the wrong number!!!

Total Pageviews